The Australian Senate has just launched a major inquiry into the nation’s soaring numbers of excess deaths among the widely vaccinated population.
The country has suffered staggering losses since the mass vaccination program was launched in 2021.
Australia led the world in tyrannical lockdowns and vaccine mandates during, and after, the pandemic.
The nation has one of the highest rates of Covid mRNA vaccination in the world.
Over the past three years, however, the country has been battling the worst level of excess mortality since World War II.
The investigation by the Australian Senate is being touted as the first instance in the world of a Parliament formally examining the issue of soaring deaths.
The successful motion to launch the inquiry was brought by United Australia Party (UAP) Senator Ralph Babet.
The motion was Babet’s fifth attempt to launch a parliamentary inquiry in two years.
Previously, the left-wing Labor government and the Greens had blocked the motion, without explaining why.
The Senate’s Community Affairs References Committee is now required to investigate the factors contributing to the abnormally high mortality.
The report is expected by the end of August.
It will be a difficult task, however.
The likelihood that there will be any admissions of wrongdoing by government bureaucrats and politicians is vanishingly small.
Even if the findings compellingly point to the vaccination program as the reason behind the excess deaths, directing accountability will be difficult.
A range of excuses and misdirection will be used to confound the picture.
The most obvious is the point that correlation does not prove causation.
It will likely be argued that just because the excess deaths happened at about the same time as the mass inoculations it does not necessarily mean there is a causal connection.
This is true, but it only means that the evidence is circumstantial, which is valid and can be conclusive, especially when there is no obvious alternative explanation.
The evidence is also supported by the fact similar surges in deaths have been observed in most countries that were heavily vaccinated.
During the hearings, there are likely to be arguments about the precision of the data and the establishment of an appropriate baseline.
There is little doubt about the overall trend, however.
In early 2023, the Australian Actuaries Institute raised the alarm about the issue.
It is also expected that government bureaucrats will argue over fine detail to distract from the big picture.
Lawmakers will need the most accurate data possible to make the case.
According to Babet, on March 26 this year, the Therapeutic Goods Administration’s (TGA) provisional mortality figures “confirm that to November 2023 there were 15,114, or 10 percent, more deaths than the baseline average.”
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has different figures showing: -3.1 percent in 2020 (the supposed peak year of the pandemic), 1.4 percent in 2021, 10.9 percent in 2022, and 9.1 percent in 2023.
These inconsistencies will have to be resolved.
World-renowned data expert Ed Dowd, the author of “Cause Unknown: The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022,” observes that Australian data has several limitations.
One of those inconsistencies is that it “does not allow us to observe the excess mortality in younger age groups with sufficient detail.”
His figures, which are broken down by age, show that the excess deaths were worst for most ages in 2022 and then declined in 2023.
The exception was the 75-84 age bracket, where excess deaths rose in 2023.
Another likely tactic is that it will be argued that the problem is “multi-factorial”: that the deaths were caused by many things.
This will have some truth to it – the lockdowns probably led to increased suicide rates, for example.
As such, these issues could be used to confuse the picture.
However, it will not explain the size of the excess mortality.
The number of excess deaths is the equivalent of what happens in a major war.
Nevertheless, the aggregate mortality statistics are not the only relevant data.
There are other pieces of evidence that can help fill in the picture.
One is that the excess deaths, which have occurred in all age groups, do not seem to have been the result of COVID-19 itself.
According to the ABS in 2022, when the excess deaths were at their peak, the median (average) age of death for COVID-19 was 86.
86 is significantly higher than the average life expectancy in Australia.
That suggests relatively few working-age and younger people died from the disease.
So, what killed them?
Another pointer is a report that there have been 20 percent more sudden cardiac arrests in Victoria than five years ago.
Of those cardiac arrest patients, more than 95 percent of them are dying.
“Of the 7,830 people whose hearts stopped beating due to this condition in 2022/23, just 388 survived, the latest Ambulance Victoria figures reveal,” reports the Herald Sun.
The ABC, the national broadcaster, reported that many of the heart attack victims are young, but did not investigate any further.
The state government’s response has been to buy more defibrillators.
There has been no mention of the vaccines as a possible cause despite accumulating evidence that the heart conditions myocarditis and pericarditis are the most commonly reported adverse events associated with the vaccines.
Especially telling has been the response from the Australian government’s equivalent to the FDA, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).
The agency simply stopped reporting on myocarditis and pericarditis, two forms are heart failure that are known side effects of Civod-mRNA shots.
Such tactics are typical of Australian bureaucrats’ efforts to protect themselves.
The biggest challenge will be analyzing the causation of the deaths in an environment where most of the people providing the data have a vested interest in not having their actions exposed, especially when the evidence might show that they have committed a homicide.
Australian doctors and academics are also under threat of losing their careers if they voice their doubts about the vaccines.
They, too, are hardly likely to be eager to take responsibility for deadly mistakes.
It is more likely that the exposing of the truth in Australia will have to wait for the insights of experts such as Dr. Francis Boyle.
Boyle was responsible for drafting the United States’ 1989 “Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act.”
As THAMBC News reported, Boyle has just testified in a Florida court case that Covid mRNA shots are “biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction.”
